Posts Tagged ‘same sex marriage’

Blue state laws enshrine gender confusion

August 15, 2013

Gender changeA new trend in blue states seems to be the notion that gender is less a biological reality than a choice that can be made by each individual. The most recent example of this came on Tuesday when California governor Jerry Brown announced that he had signed a law which will allow transgender students to choose which bathroom and locker room to use based on their self-perception and regardless of their biological gender. According to the Casa Grande Dispatch, the new law will even give transgender students the right to participate in either boys or girls sports and other “sex-segregated programs, activities and facilities.” Karen England, executive director of the Capitol Resource Institute, noted that the law does not require any proof of a gender-identity issue. Instead school administrator must rely on the student’s opinion of their gender identity.

California is only the most recent state to enact laws that prohibit discrimination based on gender identity.

 

Read the rest on  Atlanta Conservative Examiner

What’s next for defenders of marriage?

June 27, 2013
Wikimedia

Wikimedia

Wednesday’s Supreme Court rulings on marriage, while hardly unexpected by most traditional marriage advocates, have nonetheless left social conservatives disappointed.  For supporters of traditional marriage, the saving grace of the rulings was that they did not apply to the 35 states with definition of marriage laws or constitutional amendments.

 

That situation is likely to change.  If, as Justice Kennedy wrote in United States v. Windsor, a traditional marriage definition “violates basic due process and equal protection principles” then it is likely that future Supreme Court rulings will invalidate the right of the states to keep marriage between a man and a woman.  This may come through a direct challenge to a state constitutional marriage amendment or through the Constitution’s Full Faith and Credit Clause, which requires that states respect “the public acts, records, and judicial proceedings of every other state.”  Barring a change in the balance of the Court, it is likely that the justices will continue to chip away at traditional marriage.

Read the rest on  National Elections Examiner

Ten myths about gay marriage

March 27, 2013
Kurt Löwenstein Educational Center International Team/Wikimedia

Kurt Löwenstein Educational Center International Team/Wikimedia

Same-sex marriage is once again in the news. This week the Supreme Court is hearing two cases on same sex marriage, either of which could conceivably make gay marriage the law of the land and strike down the definition of marriage laws in place in 37 states and the federal government.

There are many myths and much misinformation surrounding the same-sex marriage issue:

Myth #1: Defense of marriage laws are “gay marriage bans.”

While the media and homosexual activists often refer to these laws as “gay marriage bans,” in reality they do often do not ban anything. The laws simply create a definition of marriage according to the government. The heart of the federal DOMA simply states, “… the word `marriage’ means only a legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife, and the word `spouse’ refers only to a person of the opposite sex who is a husband or a wife.”

 

Read the rest on Examiner.com:

http://www.examiner.com/list/ten-myths-about-the-gay-marriage-debate?cid=db_articles

Family studies should impact gay marriage debate

March 26, 2013
Studies indicate that children of gay couples may fare worse than those of traditional families. (Melinda/Wikimedia)

Studies indicate that children of gay couples may fare worse than those of traditional families. (Melinda/Wikimedia)

This week the Supreme Court will hear arguments on whether same sex marriage is a protected right under the Constitution. Along with whether the ability to marry anyone you choose is indeed a constitutional right, one of the issues that the justices must consider in answering this question is the question of what is best for children.

As the small number of same-sex families increased, several studies were done on the issue. Proponents of same-sex marriage have claimed that such studies have shown that gay families fare as well or better than heterosexual parents. Breakpoint quotes an American Psychological Association statement that says, “Not a single study has found children of lesbian or gay parents to be disadvantaged in any significant respect relative to children of heterosexual parents.” According to the New Republic, the Ninth Circuit Court’s decision striking down California’s definition of marriage law says, “Children raised by gay or lesbian parents are as likely as children raised by heterosexual parents to be healthy, successful, and well-adjusted. The research supporting this conclusion is accepted beyond serious debate in the field of developmental psychology.” In truth, the evidence so far has been inconclusive, but two recent studies shed doubt on these claims.

Read the rest on Examiner.com:

http://www.examiner.com/article/recent-family-studies-may-impact-supreme-court-gay-marriage-decision?cid=db_articles

My prophetic evolution

January 30, 2013

My understanding of Bible end-time prophecy has undergone an evolution over the years.  I’ve always been interested in the Revelation and what might happen at the end of time.  I suppose that this can be traced to a comic book.

When I was young, we had a number of issues of Spire Christian comics.  Some of these comic books were adaptations of Christian classics that I read later in life.  We had a comic version of “God’s Smuggler” by Brother Andrew,  “the Hiding Place” by Corrie Ten Boom, “the Cross and the Switchblade” by David Wilkerson, and “Born Again” by Chuck Colson.  There were stories of people like Dallas Cowboy coach Tom Landry, the appropriately named Nate Saint, a missionary bush pilot killed by South American natives, Mitsuo Fuchida, a pilot in the Japanese navy who led the attack on Pearl Harbor, and Johnny Cash.  There were also adaptations of Bible stories set in modern (1970s) day.  I would love to find some of these for my kids to read today.

The one that is most memorable was an adaptation of Hal Lindsey’s “There’s a New World Coming” (you can read the whole thing online here).  For a child, this was an intriguing comic.  It was also more than a little scary.  Fortunately, I was certain that the end of the world was many years into the future.

I also remember reading a short book based on the Revelation at a young age.  I think that it was called “Out of Time” or something similar.  A brief Google search didn’t turn up this book, but it was a short prototype of “Tribulation Force.”  Again, it was a bit scary for me at the time.

Fast forward about 20 years.  Pat Robertson’s “the End of the Age” (1995) was more intriguing than scary.  So were the “Left Behind” (1995-2007) novels by Tim LaHaye and Jerry Jenkins.  It was these books that probably really inspired me to start reading commentaries and guides to Revelation.  It was around this time that I remember praying for enlightenment and understanding for these Bible prophecies.

It was slow in coming, but I think that God did lead me to more understanding.  Years later, after watching the September 11 attacks and the Iraq War unfold, I began to realize that there were many similarities between radical Muslims and the forces of the Antichrist in the Revelation.  I wrote my first blog, “Islam and Revelation,” and created captainkudzu.com on October 26, 2007.

About the same time, my brother told me about a book called “Epicenter” by Joel Rosenberg.  Rosenberg made me realize that to understand what is to come, you have to look at other prophecies throughout the Bible.  Rosenberg’s book, which centers on Ezekiel 38-39, was the subject of my second blog post.

As I looked through the Bible, I found many more passages that described the end of the world as we know it outside of Revelation.  There were passages in Daniel, Joel, Thessalonians, Timothy, and Peter that also addressed eschatology, as the study of the end-times is formally known.  Jesus himself talked about the end of the age in the Mount Olivet discourse that is described in three of the four Gospels.  I took much of this information and put it into another early blog post, “Signs of the Times.”

Rosenberg’s book made me think about America.  America is the best friend that Israel has in the world.  Sometimes America seems to be Israel’s only friend.  Ezekiel 38-39 describes a multinational coalition that is assembled against Israel and that is subsequently destroyed by divine intervention.  The coalition is led by Gog of Magog, a figure that many speculate is Vladimir Putin.

I wondered how a coalition could be assembled against Israel under America’s watch.  The U.S. typically vetoes anti-Israel resolutions in the United Nations and aids Israel in its wars.  If a coalition were assembled against Israel, wouldn’t the U.S. intervene?  There is no indication in the Bible that it does.  That leaves two possibilities for the U.S.  Either America becomes anti-Israel at some point or it ceases to be a player on the world stage.

About the same time, the authors of “Left Behind” released the nonfiction, “Are We Living in the End-times?”  I recommend this book to anyone who is interested in prophecy.  It is very readable and has good explanations and descriptions of figures and events in Biblical end-time prophecy.  It does focus primarily on the events in The Revelation however.

As the Great Recession deepened and Barack Obama came into office, I began to wonder if the two events were not related to prophecy.  Barack Obama is the most anti-Israel president that the U.S. has had since Israel was reborn as a country.  Obama may have inherited the recession, but his policies prevented a recovery and, with his reelection, will lead to an economic lost decade.  While he is in office, he is rolling back American power abroad.  The Obama Administration seems to fit perfectly with the theory that America will cease to be Israel’s ally or will cease to a military and diplomatic power.  A blog, “Why is this Happening?” on Feb. 28, 2009, describes this in more detail.

Along with the decline of America, the construction of a new Jewish temple in Israel is also required before the events of Revelation can be fulfilled.  The aftermath of the War of Gog of Magog might pave the way for the rebuilding of the temple.  The Temple Mount is now occupied by the Islamic Dome of the Rock mosque.  The Israeli government protects the mosque from Jews who would like to clear the mountain and rebuild the temple.  For the Jews to destroy the mosque would undoubtedly spark a major war.  However, if the mosque were destroyed in the Magog war, it would be easy for the Jewish temple to be built on its site.

A chance meeting led to more understanding about the Jewish temple.  In 2010, while traveling home from work on an airline, I met a Jewish woman in the Newark airport.  We were eating lunch and I had been at a table by myself.  There were no other open tables so she asked to sit at mine.  I rarely strike up conversations in airports, but we started talking.

Somehow, the conversation turned to a blog that I had written a few weeks earlier, “the Khazar conspiracy.”  This post was inspired by some Ron Paul supporters who espoused the theory that modern Israelis were not Jews.  Instead, they claimed that they were Khazars, descendents of an ancient Eastern European nation that had converted to Judaism over a thousand years ago.  This theory was easily disproved by modern genetic studies which verified that Jews who migrated to Europe remained genetically distinct from their host populations and that they had originated in the Middle East.  Written two years ago, the Khazar article remains one of the most read articles on my blog.

The woman mentioned the Cohen gene, something that I had never of.  Upon investigation, I learned that the Cohen gene was a genetic marker that identified the priestly line of Aaron.  Not only had God kept his chosen people separate from the gentiles after a Diaspora lasting 2,500 years, he had kept the family of priests separate from Jewish laity.  When the Jewish temple is rebuilt, it will be simple for the new priests to be identified from the Aaronic line.

In the years of the first Obama Administration, I saw many signs that my worldview was correct.  There began a movement among the Russians and Chinese to replace the dollar with a new world currency.  I became more aware of the apocalyptic nature of the Iranian government.  In 2011, the Iranians even released a film that said that the arrival of the Mahdi, a Shia Islam version of the Messiah, was imminent.  The Arab Spring uprisings swept radical Islamists into power in many Arab countries and destabilized others, a development that prominent Israeli rabbis said may signal the coming of the Messiah.  In America, there was apostasy in the church and unprecedented attacks on freedom of religion and the freedom of speech of religious believers.  For the first time, voters approved same-sex marriage laws and President Obama publicly pushed “marriage equality.”

As the 2012 election approached, I felt that President Obama would surely be turned out of office.  Reelecting him would be like reelecting Jimmy Carter or Herbert Hoover (although Americans did elect Franklin Roosevelt, a similarly disastrous president, to an unprecedented three terms).  I felt that if Obama won the election that it would almost have to represent God moving his plan for America’s judgment forward.  In September 2012, I wrote “the Biblical prophecy case for Obama’s second term,” which described how Obama might have to remain in office in order for prophecies regarding Israel to be fulfilled.

In the weeks leading up to the election, I felt certain that Mitt Romney would win after his strong performance in the debates and President Obama’s obfuscations in the wake of the attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi.  In the end, less than a week before the election, Hurricane Sandy ravaged the east coast from Washington, D.C. to New York City.  Obama’s performance in the wake of the storm, particularly his bipartisan appearances with New Jersey governor Chris Christie, shifted the polls enough to allow Obama to eke out a victory.  In any case, the reelection of Obama represented a rejection of Christian principles and teachings by a majority of Americans.

It seemed that the path of the storm may have represented divine intervention.   In Parade magazine, Marilyn Vos Savant explained the unusual confluence of factors that steered Sandy toward New York:  “On Sandy’s way north, it ran into a vast high-pressure system over Canada, which prevented it from continuing in that direction, as hurricanes normally do, and forced it to turn west. Then, because it traveled about 300 miles over open water before making landfall, it piled up an unusually large storm surge. An infrequent jet-stream reversal helped maintain and fuel the storm. As if all that weren’t bad enough, a full moon was occurring, so the moon, the earth, and the sun were in a straight line, increasing the moon’s and sun’s gravitational effects on the tides, thus lifting the high tide even higher. Add to this that the wind and water, though not quite at hurricane levels, struck an area rarely hit by storms of this magnitude so the structures were more vulnerable and a disaster occurred.”

While researching my article on Hurricane Sandy, “’Divine wind’ swept Obama to second term,” I was led to my most recent revelation.  I discovered “the Harbinger” by Jonathan Cahn.  I was honored to have Cahn respond to several questions that I had emailed him while working on a review of his book.

While I had suspected that America was on the verge of divine judgment, Cahn’s book pointed to specifics.  Cahn found hidden but precise parallels between the fall of ancient Israel and the calamities that have befallen America since 2001.  In addition to the removal of divine protection that led to the September 11 attacks, the U.S. underwent two financial crashes that occurred on the same day of the Hebrew calendar, a day that called for the cancellation of debts according to Jewish law.  American politicians had uttered exactly the same words of defiance to God’s judgment that the ancient Israelites had proclaimed.  The American response to the 9/11 attacks led directly to the financial crash, a relationship that even secular observers have noted.

I have come to realize that the Bible is more than life’s instruction book.  It is the story of Israel, God’s chosen people.  It contains their history and their future.  The Bible is, among other things, the story of Israel’s rejection of God and ultimate restoration.  It was not until Israel rejected the Messiah that God extended the offer of repentance and salvation to the gentile world.

For that story to be complete, the U.S. must undergo radical changes.  It is likely that these changes will happen soon or are already occurring.  The process began when Israel was reconstituted as a nation in 1948.  In his Mount Olivet discourse, Jesus spoke of a blooming fig tree that is widely believed to refer to a reborn Israel.  Jesus says that the generation that sees “these things” will “not pass away” until the end-time events he describes have happened.  Obviously this means that the America must cease to be a powerful ally of Israel first.

America may cease to be an ally of Israel as pro-Muslim politicians like Barack Obama become increasingly powerful.  It might cease to be powerful.  The growth of government and the federal debt might strangle the economy to the point where the U.S. cannot support a standing army of sufficient size to protect its interests and allies around the world.  This is already happening to many European nations.

A more catastrophic scenario, and one that I fear may come to pass, is that the U.S. might suffer a military defeat.  A “nuclear 9/11” could destroy the American economy.  A nuclear attack with an electromagnetic pulse weapon could wipe out the entire American electrical grid and cause mass starvation.  Such an attack might be a prelude to a second wave of nuclear strikes or conventional attacks.

Interpretation of prophecy is not a certain thing.  Often the realization that a prophecy has been fulfilled can only take place in hindsight.  The prudent thing to do is to be prepared.  Even if there is no large scale disaster from an EMP attack, we are still subject to local disasters from hurricanes, tornados, floods, riots or even a small scale terrorist attack.  The experience of the L.A. riots, Hurricane Katrina, and Hurricane Sandy underscore the importance of preparedness and being able to fend for yourself for at least a little while.

No one can say exactly what lies ahead for America.  What can be said with certainty is that if America continues down its current path it will not only face economic stagnation, but it is increasingly likely that there will be more examples of divine “shakings” and judgment.  We should all be prepared for disasters and be ready to protect ourselves in an emergency.  We should also be spiritually prepared.  As Jonathan Cahn told me, “The time to repent, to be saved, and to get right with God . . . is now.”

Obama may owe reelection to ‘divine wind’

December 6, 2012
"God's eye" view of Hurricane Sandy (NASA/Wikimedia)

“God’s eye” view of Hurricane Sandy (NASA/Wikimedia)

In the thirteenth century, two Mongol fleets under Kublai Khan attacked Japan. On both occasions, the Mongol invasion fleets were ultimately destroyed by timely typhoons that the Japanese came to know as kamikaze or “divine wind.” The Japanese believed that the storms were summoned by the gods to protect their homeland. Hundreds of years later, during WWII, the term kamikaze was adopted by the Imperial Japanese government to describe suicide pilots who crashed their planes into American ships.

Now it is possible that another divine wind has again changed the course of history. According to an Examiner analysis of exit poll data from the 2012 presidential election, Hurricane Sandy played a crucial role in the election. In the days after the final debate between Mitt Romney and Barack Obama, polls showed a slight Romney lead with the president polling below 50 percent in most swing states. Then, on October 29-30, Hurricane Sandy struck the Mid-Atlantic States, causing flooding and heavy damage from Washington, D.C. to New York City.

 

Read the rest of this article on Examiner.com:

http://www.examiner.com/article/divine-wind-may-have-boosted-obama-to-second-term?cid=db_articles

Secession a hot topic after election

November 15, 2012

Screen shot of the Georgia petition (WhiteHouse.gov/DavidThornton)

“It’s not you, it’s us.”

 

“We’ve grown apart.  We just don’t see things the same way anymore.  You’re constant spending has driven us deep into debt.  You constantly nag us and tell us what to do.  To you, a compromise means that we totally give in and do it your way.  We can’t take it anymore.  We think it’s time to break up.”

 

These words might be spoken by an unhappy spouse, but they also reflect unhappiness with the current state of the union.  Since the reelection of Barack Obama, secession has once again become a hot topic.  The election results show that the United States is more divided than at almost any point in our history (with the notable exception of the War of Secession).  While the electoral vote wasn’t close, the popular vote in 2012 was within three percent, just as both of George W. Bush’s elections were very close.

Read the rest of this article on Examiner.com:

http://www.examiner.com/article/obama-reelection-sparks-renewed-calls-for-secession

Answering the religious left

July 9, 2012

(David MacDonald/Wikimedia)

The religious left, while still small, has grown somewhat over the last decade. While often perceived as hostile to religion, particularly Christianity, Democrats are somewhat tolerant of religious leftists. As an example, black voters are both heavily religious and heavily Democratic.

The signature issues of the religious left are war, the environment, and poverty. As the American involvement in Afghanistan and Iraq winds down and concerns about global warming abate, the major point of contention between the religious right and left concerns how to address poverty.

Read this article on Examiner.com:

http://www.examiner.com/article/answering-the-religious-left

Nine myths about same-sex marriage

June 2, 2012

(Montrealis/Wikimedia)

Same-sex marriage is once again in the news. Three weeks ago, North Carolina voters overwhelmingly approved a constitutional amendment that defined marriage as between a man and a woman. The next day, President Obama reversed his support for traditional marriage and returned to a previously stated position that same-sex couples should be granted the right to marry. Now a decision by a federal appeals court in Boston has thrust the issue into the headlines once again.

The ruling by the First Circuit of the U.S. Court of Appeals found Section Three of the federal Defense of Marriage Act, which defines marriage in federal law as between a man and a woman, to be unconstitutional. The Court did not address Section Two, which stipulates that states do not have to recognize same-sex marriages performed in other states. The Court stayed its own ruling pending appeal which will almost certainly reach the Supreme Court.

There are many myths and much misinformation surrounding the same-sex marriage issue:

Read this article on Examiner.com:

http://www.examiner.com/article/nine-myths-about-the-same-sex-marriage-debate

 

Obama’s marriage evolution may cost votes in November

May 16, 2012

(Kurt Löwenstein Educational Center International Team)

President Obama’s evolution on marriage in which he returned to his previously stated position of supporting a right for same-sex couples to marry may hurt the president with black and independent voters in November.  The president, who was widely believed to be a closeted supporter of same-sex marriage, removed all doubt in a statement last week in which he said that he personally believed that “it is important for me to go ahead and affirm that I think same sex couples should be able to get married” according to ABC News.

The president did say that the issue belonged to the states, but his administration is not defending the federal Defense of Marriage Act.  The act, passed with broad bipartisan support in 1996 prevents states from being required to recognize same-sex marriages performed in other states and defines marriage as between a man and woman for the purposes of federal law.

 

Read the rest of this article on Examiner.com:

http://www.examiner.com/article/obama-s-evolution-on-marriage-could-cost-votes-from-blacks-independents